I had to write about this record again for two reasons. ONE: When I posted it the first time I had listened to it exactly once, so I didn’t really have much of an opinion. I should have waited, because TWO: “Snacks” is the best album of 2009. Actually, I wrote about so quickly for kind of a bizarre reason. It was so good that I was AFRAID TO LISTEN TO IT. Let me admit something weird. Sometimes, when I listen to an album and immediately recognize that it’s great I start to get worried. What if it really isn’t all that good? What if I’ve fooled myself into thinking this is something it isn’t? What if it’s so good it can’t possibly be real? I think these things to myself and consciously leave the record alone so I can gain perspective. Usually when this happens it turns out that I’m just being irrational and the record actually is that good. Still, it’s a pretty rare occurrence, so believe me “Snacks” is in good company.
Anyhow, I suppose I pretty much summed this album up in the last post, but I’d just like to say that when I finally gave “Snacks” a thorough listen I thought to myself: “This is what I’ve been waiting to hear”.
It's brilliance I think is in nuance, and probably the best guitar riffage I've heard this year. The dueling guitars (something I normally am pretty intolerant of) compliment each other so well throughout the entire record because neither is overbearing. I suppose what I'm saying is that they generally work together so well that I mostly forget that there at least two guys playing guitars at all times. It helps that "Snacks" is impeccably engineered/mastered as well.
At first "Snacks" did seem a little overwhelming to be honest. Kidcrash cram a lot of ideas into each of their songs but never get lost in them (something I waited for them do to when listening to this album the first few times). Every song has a ton of structural elements but they are well focused and don't meander (now that I'm thinking about it, "Snacks" almost teeters of the math-rock line with this release). So, I suppose what I mean to say is that this album could have gone wrong in a lot of ways but didn't. "Snacks" is the best album of the year because in all ways it is fully realized (read: pretty much perfect).
For fans of: Loma Prieta, L'Antietam, Dominic
Kidcrash on Myspace
Get it (again).
Copies still available at Init (for US folks) and Denovali (for Euros)
Anyhow, I suppose I pretty much summed this album up in the last post, but I’d just like to say that when I finally gave “Snacks” a thorough listen I thought to myself: “This is what I’ve been waiting to hear”.
It's brilliance I think is in nuance, and probably the best guitar riffage I've heard this year. The dueling guitars (something I normally am pretty intolerant of) compliment each other so well throughout the entire record because neither is overbearing. I suppose what I'm saying is that they generally work together so well that I mostly forget that there at least two guys playing guitars at all times. It helps that "Snacks" is impeccably engineered/mastered as well.
At first "Snacks" did seem a little overwhelming to be honest. Kidcrash cram a lot of ideas into each of their songs but never get lost in them (something I waited for them do to when listening to this album the first few times). Every song has a ton of structural elements but they are well focused and don't meander (now that I'm thinking about it, "Snacks" almost teeters of the math-rock line with this release). So, I suppose what I mean to say is that this album could have gone wrong in a lot of ways but didn't. "Snacks" is the best album of the year because in all ways it is fully realized (read: pretty much perfect).
For fans of: Loma Prieta, L'Antietam, Dominic
Kidcrash on Myspace
Get it (again).
Copies still available at Init (for US folks) and Denovali (for Euros)
0 comments:
Post a Comment